 |
BEDANKT
MARCEL - WERKGROEP MORKHOVEN
Tiny
Mast, mother of a murdered little girl and a still missing little
boy. Here, her emotion as she meets Marcel Vervloesem of the NGO
Werkgroep Morkhoven in a congress. He discovered the Zandvoort file
in 1998 and the first elements which gave light on what has happened
to her children. He is the symbol of courage and abnegation, in
a fight of the paedocriminal networks, which is neither more, nor
less than to expose the evidences that justice does not pretend
to see.
|
No networks in Europe, according to Child Focus
The study ordered by the European Union to Childfocus does
not say a single word on the cases Zandvoort and its 93.081 victims; Cathedral
and its million evidence; Hamlet and its half million pictures of child
pornography, nor the least network which has made the international headlines.
It reveals the striking 2002 statistics, recognised quasi non-existent.
The Council of Europe will thus be able to make excellent
recommendations on the fight of isolated predators and criminals who haphazardly
prostitute children: those of which in Belgium are said to be "stepping
in Nihoul' flower beds".
Belgian
situation: will the continuation be voted next Sunday?
In 1998 - when Werkgroep Morkhoven gave justice the archives
of the Zandvoort network - the Belgian law was amended to make it possible
to the prosecutors to close an investigation according to directives' of
the Minister for justice and the Attorney Generals, with the reason "that
it was impossible to prosecute all the repported cases".
The magistrates could thus reproduce the Dutroux case without
incurring prosecution, so the study of the epidemiologic data on missing
and sexually exploited children in Europe reveals:
"In Belgium, application (of the law) is made by the
principle of expediency or opportunity. This means that the public prosecutor
has full discretion to decide whether or not to prosecute a case. (...)
Until 1998, this principle was not provided in the Belgian legislation.
Article 28 quarter of the Code of Criminal law stipulates now that the public
prosecutor, taking into account the guidelines of the criminal policy of
the minister of justice and the board of prosecutor generals decides over
the opportunity of the prosecution."
Laurette Onkelinx, Minister of Justice, and her Attorney Generals,
would thus have decided, in full legality and discretion, to keep completely
out of mind the 93.081 victims of Zandvoort, the Louf case, the Nihoul/Q8
case, the Nihoul/Nigeria case and so many others!
The Childfocus solution
The only danger likely to harm the paedophile networks remained
the civil organisations, such as those of the Werkgroep Morkhoven. "Real
Taliban", some say. "Manage to beat them is really difficult.
They don't have salary, do everything free of charge, and they only have taste
and pleasure in fighting for their cause".
Childfocus, who hid from the Council of Europe the existence
of those organisations, though blessed by victims, attempts to eliminate them
by recommending:
"Private persons cannot put themselves in the place
of a police service. The processing of data for purpose of investigation
has an unlawful purpose (sic). Besides, the storage of information
concerning suspects of sexual offences reported by a private person in view
of passing it on to law enforcement could be acceptable. Naturally, these
requirement need to be provided for by a clear and legal obligation or authorization."
Source
|
Besides the remarkable amalgam between "purpose of
investigation" and "unlawful purpose", the Council
of Europe should thus find a solution to repeal the basis of any democracy:
the laws which oblige the private persons to put themselves in the place of
the police when a situation requires the assistance to a person in danger,
and the laws that prohibit to let anyone to murder or rape another without
intervening. No one will be able to testify of a crime without a "clear
and legal obligation or authorization" ? Il will also be necessary to
repeal the laws related to the freedom of enterprise and the freedom of research,
therefore of instruction, in absence of contractual agreement with the state.
Childfocus had the tact to write the study paid by Europe for
Europe, in American (whose spelling varies from English). "The pdf
will be available online shortly, please visit us again by later",
says the Childoscope site for the last three years. In Belgium, the book is
only accessible at the library of the European Parliament, so that Europeans
cannot have access to a work paid 200.000-euro by their taxes, only by paying
it an extra 65-euro to Childfocus.
Shouldn't the European Union insist that Childfocus publish
the complete study on line? Meanwhile, the Foundation Princess of Croÿ
asks the Italian Taliban, a study on the possibility that there are no accessible
statistics in Italy.
