|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CLOSING ZANDVOORT/FRANCE [10] Partly the fault of Dutroux and Nihoul!Par Jacqueline de Croÿ - 13 avril 2010 -1- Prosecutor Bourlet, in charge of requesting the application of the law in the Dutroux case, requested three hearings of the NGO Morkhoven on the links between Dutroux, Nihoul and the child pornography production network of Zandvoort. The minutes of Marcel Vervloesem's hearings as spokesman of NGO, appears to be missing from the Dutroux DVD, we are told. These DVDs were produced by the justice department, so that the lawyers could sort out the 400,000 pages of the dossier. Such a wilfully impeding the rights of defence of Dutroux, would allow the world's most famous paedocriminal, to seek the annihilation of his sentence!Why would Belgian justice take such a risk? Because Morkhoven had shown the Antwerp branch of the same network in 1988, in vain. The ministers had systematically answered to the parliamentary questions about alleged corruption, by blackening the NGO, to clear their administration. The Dutroux case had put the Belgian people in such anger that the courthouses would have been dismantled stone by stone, if they had learned that the network could have been dismantled seven years before the murder of the little girls.The "kidnapping cell" of Neufchâteau found interest in the Zandvoort file in only February 2001, when Marcel Vervloesem collected the testimony of Robert Jan Van Warmerdam, a transsexual prostitute of sadomasochistic orientation of the Zandvoort ring. Former victim and drugged by the necessity to survive the pain inherent to these activities, R-J Warmerdam lived in the remorse of having killed a child during a film, in a sadomasochist production studio of Amsterdam. Dutroux regularly came to that studio, he said. It occurred that this studio, scene of the crime, belonged to "Mistress Roxanne", former employer of the wife of the head of the Dutroux criminal gang: Michel Nihoul. Marc Dutroux was prostitute when he was a minor, which explains how the son of school teachers had become involved in all sorts of trafficking, including that of children for the sex trade. The Belgian justice department was held by Stefaan De Clerck, when Dutroux, on parole for the kidnapping and raping of five young girls, kidnapped and raped nine other young girls, between June 1995 and August 1996. The inquiry conducted in Slovakia has identified a dozen girls, who had been drugged, imported and abused by Dutroux. He wanted to set up his child own brothels channel and pornography studio with young girls from the Eastern Europe, abducting them for periods of three months, according to one of his accomplices. De Clerck all the same had the nerve to assure in 1997 that there was no child pornography production ring, and accuse Morkhoven of blackening the police. The testimony of R-J Warmerdam was showing on the contrary that there was a connection between the abduction of children paid 150,000 BEF (3,700 euros) to the band of Dutroux, for an income of 1000 euros per night, plus the price of pornography. Ulrich, godfather of the Zandvoort network, was the most important client for this sort of production. If the Belgian victims of Dutroux are not be in the CD-ROMs of Zandvoort, it would be very surprising not to find in it at least one of his Slovakian victims. When the court of Neufchâteau asked Morkhoven to forward them the result of their researches, prosecutor Bourlet had to destroy the threats of his colleagues on Marcel Vervloesem. The prosecutors of Turnhout and Dendermonde were prosecuting him for the possession of the child pornography, as a way to stop him forwarding the incriminating evidence. A new European law required the EU countries to promote the delivery of such material for investigations. Prosecutor Bourlet could thus give a formal guarantee that he would not initiate a prosecution. The agreement was signed on March 4, 2001, by a formal complaint of Morkhoven making a synthesis of their discoveries. But on March 6, 2001, day the lawyer brought the boxes of exhibits, prosecutor Bourlet informed her that it was impossible that he would "take again in charge a case of this magnitude with staff currently so busy", and also because they "could not afford the cost". This was thus a trap. Morkhoven had no reason to forward the result of its investigations to a tribunal that did not have any intention to do anything with it. Bourlet instructed his investigators to ask Marcel Vervloesem to provide the necessary details to help him "to sort through this mass of information and documents." It was before all a matter of obtaining the promise from Morkhoven that they would not say a word to the press of the content of the minutes, under the pretext of "avoiding to alert the paedo criminals of the enquiries". The first hearing, on March 27, 2001, gave a brief overview of the contents of CD-ROMs and documentation, their origin and who had a copy of what. The second hearing, on April 3, 2001, concerned the French connections and identification of the famous magistrate trousers down. The next appointment had been made for April 10, to speak of Dutroux and Nihoul connections with sadomasochistic branch of Amsterdam. But the day before, on April 9, the prosecutor Bourlet asked his colleagues of the Turnhout and Dendermonde tribunals to take over the dossier, specifying that the Prosecutor General had confirmed that they were prosecuting Marcel Vervloesem ! The request (not require the application of the law according to the criminal network) would have been ordered by head prosecutor of Liège. Bourlet is overworked. He has not the means to treat the dossier. The federal court "is not operational". He thus forwards the dossier to those who instigate the death sentence of Marcel Vervloesem, because "their will well have to be a tribunal to fulfil this priority of the federal plan." The priority of Neufchâteau is given to the 6 Belgian victims, explains Bourlet, as if the dozen imported Slovak girls did not exist. Bourlet does not explain why he does not forward a copy of the dossier to the French justice, whereas it concerns victims claiming charges in France, against Nihoul and the magistrate trousers down of photograph n°9. The Dutroux case has been delayed until a reasonable time limit specified by the law, to have time to criminalize Marcel Vervloesem Morkhoven and destroy the reputation of Morkhoven in order to prevent the international press back to them. The prosecutor Dufour of Dendermonde refused to require the application of the law on the Zandvoort dossier, which as a continuation of the Temse/Madeira file, on the ground "that significant convictions were handed down", as if there were non other to consider. Prosecutor Janssens of Turnhout accepted the complaint of Morkhoven, but never requested the application of the law. Prosecutor Visart de Bocarmé of Namur accepted a section of the file, concerning recidivists of the network CRIES, active in his sector. The revelations of Marcel Vervloesem, mentioned in the minutes 8.220/01 of April 3, 2001, led on October 2, 2001, to 15³m of child pornography and the arrests of four recidivists. The merits of Morkhoven were awarded to information of Child Focus, a governmental organisation created after the Temse/Madeira network in 1998. In 2003, four months before the Dutroux prosecution, the prosecutor Van Der Flaas of Turnhout requested to condemn Marcel Vervloesem for nine rapes, though he had proof that the complaints were paid 15.000-FB (375-EUR), each. The week before the Dutroux trial, a police officer has telephoned me to know what I knew about "Maîtresse Roxane". I had studied this huge dossier for only one year, and I had not yet reached that branch. There were enough people interested in the Dutroux case, for us to have a reason of worrying about it. It was unthinkable that nobody would have called us, if such important documents were missing from the file. The whole trial was to present Marc Dutroux as an isolated predator, which would have been impossible with the testimony of J-R Warmerdam. Cold as death, ministers, judges, police and officials have granted their act together in a macabre dance of stolen parts on the record, violations of procedures, lies and gratuitous insults, in order to silence Marcel Vervloesem once and for all. They were ready to kill a man, not to protect the criminals who had already been judged and sentenced, but the higher civil-servants, whose faults had already killed children. Jo Vandeurzen, when he was Minister of Justice, has accepted the mission of finishing off Marcel Vervloesem, by a detention that doctors had predicted he could not survive. This minister has answered to a parliamentary question on the closing of the Zandvoort case without judgment, saying that "Marcel Vervloesem never wanted to make a statement about these cd-roms". See the truth here, in the letter of Mr Bourlet, reference "T.3620/96" dated of April 9, 2001:
In conclusion, the Dutch prosecutor gave priority to child's murder revealed that J-R Warmerdam in a snuff movie, while all the Belgian prosecutors, have given priority to assassinate Marcel. None of this would have happen, as if it had not been so convenient to a clique of French personalities, close to the magistrate trousers down on picture No. 9.
|
L'incompétence française de visu & in situ | French incompetence de visu & in situ | L'incompétenza francese de visu & in situ |
ZANDVOORT/FRANCE: NON LIEU |
ZANDVOORT/FRANCE: WITHDRAWAL OF CASE |
ZANDVOORT/FRANCIA: NON LUOGO A PROCEDERE |
Droit
Fondamental | Créez
votre badge
_____