Marcel Vervloesem at the Court of Cassation
Zandvoort file secretly closed
in 1999 under the motive of "unknown culprits" and stolen CDs
The higher Council of Justice reveals that the Court of Antwerp has judged
Marcel Vervloesem in 2008, for having possessed the compact discs of child
pornography he has sent to the King of Belgium, though the Zandvoort file
had been closed in 1999, due to UNKNOWN CULPRITS.
The victims were then crowned by the theft of 7 compact discs with the
pictures of these crimes, which Marcel Vervloesem had, under the name
of the Werkgroep Morkhoven, his organisation fighting child abuse, entrusted
to the King.
A thorough investigation was started on 04.13.99 and the Court of Antwerp
closed on 04.18.99. The King was obviously not advised of the number of
victims, who are 90.081, according to Interpol. The normal weekly timetable
in Belgium being 35 hours of work, the mathematical equation show that
these children have been object of maximum 3 minute deep inquiry each,
the dossiers closed at a speed of 187 an hour.
Deep investigation
on 93.081 child abuse
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= 3.13 min./victim
96 days : 7 X 35 hours
|
|
Click
on picture fororiginal version |
Letter of the Higher Council of Justice N/07/0185/BDM/KDB - free
translation
To Mr Marcel Vervloesem
Koninkrijk, 61
2200 Morkhoven
Brussels - 21.02.08
Our ref: N/07/0185/BDM/KDB
Dear Sir,
Concern: your letter of October 17, 2007
We come back to you concerning our mail of January 16, 2008.
In April 1999, you sent compact discs, having as content the abuse of
children, to the dignitaries to formulate a complaint relating to this
dreadful form of childtrade. The General Justice Court of Antwerp reacted
at the request of Mr Tony Van Parys and opened a file.
Since however, you would not have heard anything any more about this
case. As 8 years passed meanwhile, you informed, July 31, 2007, the General
Court of Antwerp’s justice to know the state of the cases and you asked
for the consultation of file AN.37.97.242/99.
The General Court justice answered you that, the file had been transferred
to the General Court of justice and that for further information on this
subject, you could consult it, which you also did on September 9, 2007.
October 25, 2007, you received a reaction of the prosecuting attorney
Tack who let you know that the file was visible in the file 130.P.2007,
which can be consulted at the clerk's office of the Court of Appeal of
Antwerp.
October 31, 2007, you consulted this file, but the requested file was
not found there. This was confirmed during your following visit on November
2, 2007, when again, the file was sought, this time with the assistance
of the head of service of the clerk's office.
November 5, 2007, you wrote to General Court of Antwerp’s justice, in
order to communicate, that the required file is not in the file expected
and you again asked to be able to consult file AN.37.97.242/99.
The General Court of justice confirms that on April 13, 1999, the 7 compact
discs were delivered to the Criminal Investigation Department for further
enquiry. July 18, 1999, the Court of Antwerp closed the file after a deep
investigation, under the motive of unknown culprits, after which the file
was returned to the General Court of justice.
The Attorney General confirms that the file, which you solicited, was
object of the investigation of his services but which could not be found
anywhere. Meanwhile, following a deep investigation in the files of the
prosecutor of the king in Antwerp, a complete copy of the file with the
number of note AN37.97.242/99 was found.
This copy, as well as a copy of the complete correspondence, was joined
to the main file. The Attorney General in function informed you on November
26, 2007 that you could bring all your means, your complaints and arguments
at the prosecution of December 5, 2007. Although a complete copy of the
file is found, remains that the original is untraceable neither at the
Court of the King's prosecutor, nor at the General Court of justice. Your
complaint, with regard to this aspect, is thus founded.
The General Court of Antwerp’s justice and the King's prosecutor of Antwerp
will be advised of this decision. Your file of complaint is closed.
Very best greetings,
Geert Vervaeke, president of the commission of opinion and enquiry
of the Dutch-speaking council |